CAWA vs. FLOW

Dear Editor:

Transparency. Hmmm…

For the city, might that mean holding meetings, asking for public input, answering questions, explaining the results of the feasibility study, the purpose of the bond measure and where and why uncertainty crops up in figuring costs,  posting information online and in print form? Oh, wait. The city has done all this.

For groups, might that mean publishing who your members are and how you are funded? Claremont FLOW has done this (www.claremontflow.org) but CAWA hasn't. I’d really like to know who, beyond the four individuals who signed the recent letter published in the COURIER, are numbered among the supposed “hundreds” of CAWA supporters. A little transparency, please?

Barbara Rugeley
Claremont